Invalid Visits From Partners
Paid channels and programmatic partners were sending invalid visits that consumed budget without generating real conversions. The mismatch between reported clicks and actual visits was alarming.
Opticks revealed up to 63.4% invalid traffic from programmatic partners, 22.4% in Google Display — enabling Unisa to reallocate budget and double their return on ad spend in affiliation.
Trusted by 6,000+ businesses · €6M+ in recovered ad spend
The Client
Unisa is an internationally renowned footwear manufacturer founded in the 1970s. Known for comfort and quality of materials, their products can be found in the best European multi-brand boutiques. The brand has successfully positioned itself as one of the leading European footwear companies.
As their marketing team moved advertising spending to online channels, they heavily increased their digital advertising budget and began leveraging new platforms — making it critical to ensure every euro was reaching real customers.
The Challenge
As Unisa invested massive budgets in paid traffic, their team needed to guarantee the highest advertising returns. But two core problems stood in the way: difficulty gaining insights on traffic validity from programmatic partners, and a lack of transparency from PPC platforms.
Paid channels and programmatic partners were sending invalid visits that consumed budget without generating real conversions. The mismatch between reported clicks and actual visits was alarming.
Campaigns were underperforming without clear explanations. Big discrepancies between clicks reported by Google and Meta versus actual valid traffic remained hidden from the team.
Without concrete data, communicating with partners about invalid traffic was difficult and time-consuming. There was no proof to back up their suspicions of fraudulent activity.
“The results of our partners did not correspond with the analysis we were making. There was clearly a problem somewhere, but not where we expected it.”
Aurora Esteve — Senior Paid Media Manager, Unisa
The Solution
Opticks gave Unisa the granular visibility they needed to detect ad fraud by channel, estimate losses, and take decisive action — transforming suspicions into undeniable proof.
Opticks confirmed Unisa’s doubts about fake clicks from Google and Meta. It demonstrated big discrepancies between clicks reported by platforms versus actual valid traffic — and uncovered invalid traffic from programmatic partners they thought were performing well, including the market leader in retargeting advertising.
With Opticks, Unisa can now evaluate the actual performance of each campaign and channel, identifying where returns are lowest. This increased visibility helps the team make the best decisions for sustainable business growth.
Opticks data represents undeniable proof of invalid traffic that partners cannot deny. This simplifies communication, guarantees better results, and gives Unisa the leverage to demand accountability from every traffic source.
“I use the solution on a weekly basis. It is very intuitive and easy to use, even for someone like me who is not specialised in analytics.”
Aurora Esteve — Senior Paid Media Manager, Unisa
Want the same visibility for your campaigns?
Get Your Free Traffic AuditThe Results
Opticks uncovered 22.4% invalid clicks in Google Display, 9.3% invalid clicks in CPC, and up to 63.4% from some programmatic partners. The data enabled Unisa to avoid wasting thousands of euros each month.
What They Said
Without Opticks, we would still be wasting our budget on invalid traffic sources. We know Opticks has our back and can provide us support.
Biggest Impact
With Opticks, Unisa transformed their advertising strategy from guesswork to data-driven precision. The ability to uncover the actual fake click rate gave the team the confidence to demand accountability and reallocate budgets where they truly matter.
Beyond E-Commerce
Invalid traffic inflating CPAs, polluting optimisation algorithms, and draining budgets — these patterns are consistent across every industry running paid digital advertising. What will your traffic audit reveal?
Invalid traffic inflates CPCs, wastes budget on fake clicks, and distorts campaign performance data. For e-commerce brands like Unisa, this means paying for visits that will never result in a purchase. Unisa discovered 22.4% invalid clicks in Google Display and up to 63.4% from programmatic partners — budget that was reaching bots instead of real shoppers.
Unisa found 22.4% invalid clicks in Google Display, 9.3% in CPC, up to 63.4% from some programmatic partners, and 74.8% invalid traffic concentrated in the USA. Some countries showed up to 98% invalid traffic. The 2.5% global average masked extreme concentrations in specific markets.
Yes. Opticks revealed up to 63.4% invalid traffic from programmatic partners that Unisa thought were performing well — including the market leader in retargeting advertising. The platform provides granular data by partner, campaign, country, and channel.
Most clients are up and running in under 5 minutes. Opticks uses a lightweight JavaScript tag that works with Google Ads, Meta Ads, programmatic platforms, and affiliate networks. No developer integration is required.
Opticks provides undeniable proof of invalid traffic that partners cannot deny. Before Opticks, Unisa found it difficult and time-consuming to communicate with partners about fraud. Now, the data simplifies negotiations and gives them leverage to demand accountability from every traffic source.
Yes. By removing invalid traffic from your funnel, campaigns optimise towards real users, directly improving ROAS and reducing wasted spend. Unisa doubled their ROAS in affiliation channels after implementing Opticks and reallocating budget to verified traffic sources.
Get Started
Unisa uncovered up to 63.4% invalid traffic from programmatic partners and doubled their ROAS. See exactly how much of your ad spend is going to invalid traffic.
No commitment required · Results visible within days · Trusted by 6,000+ businesses