Budget Wasted on Fraud
Advertising investment was being lost to fraudulent and irrelevant clicks. Invalid and non-human traffic was silently consuming budget without generating real engagement or bookings.
Case Study · Hospitality & Tourism
How a leading travel company recovered 2.3% of its annual marketing budget by filtering invalid traffic across Google Ads, Meta Ads, and Microsoft Ads.
The Client
A well-established travel industry company operating across key markets, this client relied heavily on digital advertising to drive bookings and brand visibility. With significant investment across Google Ads, Meta Ads, and Microsoft Ads, ensuring that every euro of marketing spend reached real audiences was critical to maintaining competitive performance.
The company sought a robust solution to detect, filter, and prevent invalid traffic across all advertising channels — protecting their investment and improving campaign performance in their most strategic markets.
The Challenge
A significant portion of the digital marketing budget was being wasted due to invalid and non-human traffic. The company needed to identify, measure, and eliminate fraudulent clicks that were draining investment and distorting campaign performance data.
Advertising investment was being lost to fraudulent and irrelevant clicks. Invalid and non-human traffic was silently consuming budget without generating real engagement or bookings.
Return on Ad Spend was declining because campaigns were not reaching real audiences. Polluted traffic data was undermining optimisation efforts and inflating acquisition costs.
Optimisation challenges spanned key platforms — Google Ads (Search, Display, PMAX, Demand Gen), Meta Ads, and Microsoft Ads — making it difficult to detect and prevent invalid traffic consistently.
The Solution
Opticks provided the travel company with comprehensive invalid traffic detection and filtering across every advertising platform — giving them visibility into where budget was being wasted and the tools to stop it.
Opticks was deployed across Google Ads (Search, Display, PMAX, Demand Gen), Meta Ads, and Microsoft Ads — covering the full breadth of the company’s digital advertising footprint.
Advanced detection algorithms identified and classified invalid traffic across all channels. On Google Ads, invalid traffic was reduced from 5% down to less than 1%.
Non-human traffic on Meta Ads was kept to approximately 0.5%. Real-time filtering ensured budget was continuously protected throughout 2024.
2.3% of the annual marketing budget was recovered and reinvested into more effective campaigns, allowing the client to strengthen its presence in key markets without increasing overall spend.
Want the same visibility for your campaigns?
The Results
By filtering invalid traffic across Google Ads, Meta Ads, and Microsoft Ads, the company recovered 2.3% of its annual marketing budget — with monthly savings ranging from 0.5% to 3.8% of total spend throughout 2024.
Deep Dive
Monthly savings ranged from 0.5% to 3.8% of the marketing budget throughout 2024. The highest savings occurred in November and December, coinciding with peak travel booking seasons.
2.3% of annual budget recovered · Meta Ads non-human traffic kept at ~0.5%
Budget Impact
Throughout 2024, the monthly savings represented 0.5% to 3.8% of the marketing budget. This recovery allowed the client to strengthen its presence in key markets without increasing overall budget — turning fraud prevention into a competitive advantage.
Beyond Travel
Fraudulent clicks draining budgets, inflating CPAs, and polluting optimisation algorithms — these patterns are consistent across every industry running paid digital advertising. What will your traffic audit reveal?
Get Started
This travel company recovered 2.3% of its annual marketing budget. See exactly how much of your ad spend is going to invalid traffic — and recover it.